diff options
| author | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2025-11-20 09:10:08 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2025-11-20 09:10:08 +0100 |
| commit | da483878d8f455cc79a9516eff3afc10e6f82459 (patch) | |
| tree | fc8a4f54a650e28571f679bf8286f8e612bb5989 | |
| parent | 564dccb8cea993f3b9a8cb6cd1169527295648a0 (diff) | |
change problem domain; add reference
| -rw-r--r-- | old/intro-copyleft-use.md (renamed from intro.md) | 0 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | ref.bib | 128 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | report.qmd | 26 |
3 files changed, 144 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/intro.md b/old/intro-copyleft-use.md index c5c6278..c5c6278 100644 --- a/intro.md +++ b/old/intro-copyleft-use.md @@ -780,6 +780,134 @@ publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, } +@Article{Cobreros2017, + author = {Cobreros, Pablo and Egré, Paul and Ripley, Dave and van Rooij, Robert}, + date = {2017-10}, + journaltitle = {Synthese}, + title = {Tolerant reasoning: nontransitive or nonmonotonic?}, + doi = {10.1007/s11229-017-1584-8}, + issn = {1573-0964}, + number = {S3}, + pages = {681--705}, + volume = {199}, + file = {:Cobreros2017 - Tolerant Reasoning_ Nontransitive or Nonmonotonic_.pdf:PDF:https\://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-017-1584-8.pdf}, + publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, +} + +@Book{Popper2013, + author = {Popper, Karl R.}, + date = {2013}, + title = {The Open Society and Its Enemies}, + edition = {New One-Volume edition with a New introduction by Alan Ryan and an essay by E. H. Gombrich}, + editor = {E. Gombrich and Alan Ryan}, + isbn = {9781400846672}, + location = {Princeton, NJ}, + pagetotal = {1}, + publisher = {Princeton University Press}, + subtitle = {New One-Volume Edition}, + ppn_GVK = {1066745226}, +} + +@Article{Zuolo2013, + author = {Federico Zuolo}, + date = {2013-06}, + journaltitle = {European Journal of Political Theory}, + title = {Toleration and informal groups}, + doi = {10.1177/1474885112465249}, + issn = {1741-2730}, + number = {3}, + pages = {288--305}, + subtitle = {How does the formal dimension affect groups’ capacity to tolerate?}, + volume = {12}, + file = {:Zuolo2013 - Toleration and Informal Groups.pdf:PDF}, + publisher = {SAGE Publications}, +} + +@Book{Forst2012, + author = {Forst, Rainer}, + date = {2012}, + title = {Tolerance in Conflict}, + doi = {10.1017/cbo9781139051200}, + isbn = {9781139051200}, + publisher = {Cambridge University Press}, + subtitle = {Past and Present}, + file = {:Forst2012 - Tolerance in Conflict.pdf:PDF}, +} + +@Article{Apressyan2012, + author = {Apressyan, Ruben}, + date = {2012}, + journaltitle = {Journal of Philosophical Research}, + title = {The Principle of Toleration}, + doi = {10.5840/jpr201237supplement39}, + issn = {1053-8364}, + number = {9999}, + pages = {223--227}, + subtitle = {Under What Conditions?}, + volume = {37}, + file = {:Apressyan2012 - The Principle of Toleration.pdf:PDF:https\://www.pdcnet.org/8525737F00583637/file/43573BDB8FA8F407C1257A610078B1CA/$FILE/jpr_2012_0037_9999_0235_0239.pdf}, + publisher = {Philosophy Documentation Center}, +} + +@Article{Panda2012, + author = {Panda, Ranjan K.}, + date = {2012-04}, + journaltitle = {ETHICS IN PROGRESS}, + title = {Ethics of Knowledge Sharing}, + doi = {10.14746/eip.2012.1.3}, + issn = {2084-9257}, + number = {1}, + pages = {53--70}, + subtitle = {A Perspective of Social Ontology}, + volume = {3}, + file = {:Panda2012 - Ethics of Knowledge Sharing.pdf:PDF:https\://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/download/10453/9992}, + publisher = {Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan}, +} + +@Article{Verkuyten2019, + author = {Verkuyten, Maykel and Yogeeswaran, Kumar and Adelman, Levi}, + date = {2019-09}, + journaltitle = {European Journal of Social Psychology}, + title = {Toleration and prejudice‐reduction}, + doi = {10.1002/ejsp.2624}, + issn = {1099-0992}, + number = {2}, + pages = {239--255}, + subtitle = {Two ways of improving intergroup relations}, + volume = {50}, + file = {:Verkuyten2019 - Toleration and Prejudice‐reduction.pdf:PDF}, + publisher = {Wiley}, +} + +@Article{Rappaport2017, + author = {Jesse Rappaport}, + date = {2017-11}, + journaltitle = {Philosophy & Technology}, + title = {Is Proprietary Software Unjust?}, + doi = {10.1007/s13347-017-0294-y}, + issn = {2210-5441}, + number = {3}, + pages = {437--453}, + subtitle = {Examining the Ethical Foundations of Free Software}, + volume = {31}, + file = {:Rappaport2017 - Is Proprietary Software Unjust_.pdf:PDF}, + publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, +} + +@Article{Bain2020, + author = {Andrew Bain and Paul Formosa}, + date = {2020-04}, + journaltitle = {Kantian Review}, + title = {Toleration and Some Related Concepts in Kant}, + doi = {10.1017/s1369415420000035}, + issn = {2044-2394}, + number = {2}, + pages = {167--192}, + volume = {25}, + file = {:Bain2020 - Toleration and Some Related Concepts in Kant.pdf:PDF}, + publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, +} + @Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:biblatex;} @Comment{jabref-meta: fileDirectory-jonas-bastian:/home/jonas/Projects/RUC/LIB/copyleft;} @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- title: Er copyleft etisk forsvarligt? -subtitle: | - Moralfilosofisk undersøgelse af tolerance ved åben deling af ideer +#subtitle: | +# Moralfilosofisk undersøgelse af en type af software-licenser date: 2025-12-18 @@ -77,11 +77,11 @@ include-in-header: #keep-tex: true --- -<!-- - # Abstract -I denne tekst undersøges det, +<!-- +Denne tekst undersøger en type af software-licenser moralfilosofisk. + hvorvidt vi, når vi deler kreative ressourcer, bør sikre samme vilkår transitivt som vi tildeler direkte. Open Knowledge er kreative ressourcer som er sikret, @@ -103,11 +103,13 @@ hvorvidt etisk fremsyn er normativt for fælled-baseret peer-produktion, dvs. hvorvidt vi, når vi deler, bør sikre samme vilkår transitivt som vi tildeler direkte. +--> ::: {lang=en} -FIXME: unfinished... +FIXME +<!-- Open Source is a popular praxis for sharing creative resources. Several variants of Open Source exist, of which one the older ones---copyleft---is distinguished @@ -115,15 +117,13 @@ by it embedding an ethical principle called ethical foresight. This paper investigates whether ethical foresight is normative for commons-based peer production. +--> ::: ---> - # Introduktion -{{< include intro.md >}} - +<!-- # Disposition 1. Introduktion @@ -142,13 +142,19 @@ for commons-based peer production. * Hvordan kan deontologien sætte grænser for, hvorvidt lukning af åbne ideer skal tolereres? 8. Diskussion af deontologiens evne til at fortælle os hvad vi skal tolerere. +--> # Teori og metode +<!-- {{< include method.md >}} +--> # FIXME: centrale afsnit... +FIXME: @Chopra2008, kap. 2. +Måske også @Rappaport2017. + <!-- # Redegørelse for copyleft |
