aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-11-20 09:10:08 +0100
committerJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-11-20 09:10:08 +0100
commitda483878d8f455cc79a9516eff3afc10e6f82459 (patch)
treefc8a4f54a650e28571f679bf8286f8e612bb5989
parent564dccb8cea993f3b9a8cb6cd1169527295648a0 (diff)
change problem domain; add reference
-rw-r--r--old/intro-copyleft-use.md (renamed from intro.md)0
-rw-r--r--ref.bib128
-rw-r--r--report.qmd26
3 files changed, 144 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/intro.md b/old/intro-copyleft-use.md
index c5c6278..c5c6278 100644
--- a/intro.md
+++ b/old/intro-copyleft-use.md
diff --git a/ref.bib b/ref.bib
index db1f8bf..badfdee 100644
--- a/ref.bib
+++ b/ref.bib
@@ -780,6 +780,134 @@
publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
}
+@Article{Cobreros2017,
+ author = {Cobreros, Pablo and Egré, Paul and Ripley, Dave and van Rooij, Robert},
+ date = {2017-10},
+ journaltitle = {Synthese},
+ title = {Tolerant reasoning: nontransitive or nonmonotonic?},
+ doi = {10.1007/s11229-017-1584-8},
+ issn = {1573-0964},
+ number = {S3},
+ pages = {681--705},
+ volume = {199},
+ file = {:Cobreros2017 - Tolerant Reasoning_ Nontransitive or Nonmonotonic_.pdf:PDF:https\://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-017-1584-8.pdf},
+ publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
+}
+
+@Book{Popper2013,
+ author = {Popper, Karl R.},
+ date = {2013},
+ title = {The Open Society and Its Enemies},
+ edition = {New One-Volume edition with a New introduction by Alan Ryan and an essay by E. H. Gombrich},
+ editor = {E. Gombrich and Alan Ryan},
+ isbn = {9781400846672},
+ location = {Princeton, NJ},
+ pagetotal = {1},
+ publisher = {Princeton University Press},
+ subtitle = {New One-Volume Edition},
+ ppn_GVK = {1066745226},
+}
+
+@Article{Zuolo2013,
+ author = {Federico Zuolo},
+ date = {2013-06},
+ journaltitle = {European Journal of Political Theory},
+ title = {Toleration and informal groups},
+ doi = {10.1177/1474885112465249},
+ issn = {1741-2730},
+ number = {3},
+ pages = {288--305},
+ subtitle = {How does the formal dimension affect groups’ capacity to tolerate?},
+ volume = {12},
+ file = {:Zuolo2013 - Toleration and Informal Groups.pdf:PDF},
+ publisher = {SAGE Publications},
+}
+
+@Book{Forst2012,
+ author = {Forst, Rainer},
+ date = {2012},
+ title = {Tolerance in Conflict},
+ doi = {10.1017/cbo9781139051200},
+ isbn = {9781139051200},
+ publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
+ subtitle = {Past and Present},
+ file = {:Forst2012 - Tolerance in Conflict.pdf:PDF},
+}
+
+@Article{Apressyan2012,
+ author = {Apressyan, Ruben},
+ date = {2012},
+ journaltitle = {Journal of Philosophical Research},
+ title = {The Principle of Toleration},
+ doi = {10.5840/jpr201237supplement39},
+ issn = {1053-8364},
+ number = {9999},
+ pages = {223--227},
+ subtitle = {Under What Conditions?},
+ volume = {37},
+ file = {:Apressyan2012 - The Principle of Toleration.pdf:PDF:https\://www.pdcnet.org/8525737F00583637/file/43573BDB8FA8F407C1257A610078B1CA/$FILE/jpr_2012_0037_9999_0235_0239.pdf},
+ publisher = {Philosophy Documentation Center},
+}
+
+@Article{Panda2012,
+ author = {Panda, Ranjan K.},
+ date = {2012-04},
+ journaltitle = {ETHICS IN PROGRESS},
+ title = {Ethics of Knowledge Sharing},
+ doi = {10.14746/eip.2012.1.3},
+ issn = {2084-9257},
+ number = {1},
+ pages = {53--70},
+ subtitle = {A Perspective of Social Ontology},
+ volume = {3},
+ file = {:Panda2012 - Ethics of Knowledge Sharing.pdf:PDF:https\://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/download/10453/9992},
+ publisher = {Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan},
+}
+
+@Article{Verkuyten2019,
+ author = {Verkuyten, Maykel and Yogeeswaran, Kumar and Adelman, Levi},
+ date = {2019-09},
+ journaltitle = {European Journal of Social Psychology},
+ title = {Toleration and prejudice‐reduction},
+ doi = {10.1002/ejsp.2624},
+ issn = {1099-0992},
+ number = {2},
+ pages = {239--255},
+ subtitle = {Two ways of improving intergroup relations},
+ volume = {50},
+ file = {:Verkuyten2019 - Toleration and Prejudice‐reduction.pdf:PDF},
+ publisher = {Wiley},
+}
+
+@Article{Rappaport2017,
+ author = {Jesse Rappaport},
+ date = {2017-11},
+ journaltitle = {Philosophy & Technology},
+ title = {Is Proprietary Software Unjust?},
+ doi = {10.1007/s13347-017-0294-y},
+ issn = {2210-5441},
+ number = {3},
+ pages = {437--453},
+ subtitle = {Examining the Ethical Foundations of Free Software},
+ volume = {31},
+ file = {:Rappaport2017 - Is Proprietary Software Unjust_.pdf:PDF},
+ publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
+}
+
+@Article{Bain2020,
+ author = {Andrew Bain and Paul Formosa},
+ date = {2020-04},
+ journaltitle = {Kantian Review},
+ title = {Toleration and Some Related Concepts in Kant},
+ doi = {10.1017/s1369415420000035},
+ issn = {2044-2394},
+ number = {2},
+ pages = {167--192},
+ volume = {25},
+ file = {:Bain2020 - Toleration and Some Related Concepts in Kant.pdf:PDF},
+ publisher = {Cambridge University Press (CUP)},
+}
+
@Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:biblatex;}
@Comment{jabref-meta: fileDirectory-jonas-bastian:/home/jonas/Projects/RUC/LIB/copyleft;}
diff --git a/report.qmd b/report.qmd
index 7b5a2c7..02e47d2 100644
--- a/report.qmd
+++ b/report.qmd
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
title: Er copyleft etisk forsvarligt?
-subtitle: |
- Moralfilosofisk undersøgelse af tolerance ved åben deling af ideer
+#subtitle: |
+# Moralfilosofisk undersøgelse af en type af software-licenser
date: 2025-12-18
@@ -77,11 +77,11 @@ include-in-header:
#keep-tex: true
---
-<!--
-
# Abstract
-I denne tekst undersøges det,
+<!--
+Denne tekst undersøger en type af software-licenser moralfilosofisk.
+
hvorvidt vi, når vi deler kreative ressourcer,
bør sikre samme vilkår transitivt som vi tildeler direkte.
Open Knowledge er kreative ressourcer som er sikret,
@@ -103,11 +103,13 @@ hvorvidt etisk fremsyn er normativt
for fælled-baseret peer-produktion,
dvs. hvorvidt vi, når vi deler, bør sikre samme vilkår transitivt
som vi tildeler direkte.
+-->
::: {lang=en}
-FIXME: unfinished...
+FIXME
+<!--
Open Source is a popular praxis for sharing creative resources.
Several variants of Open Source exist,
of which one the older ones---copyleft---is distinguished
@@ -115,15 +117,13 @@ by it embedding an ethical principle called ethical foresight.
This paper investigates
whether ethical foresight is normative
for commons-based peer production.
+-->
:::
--->
-
# Introduktion
-{{< include intro.md >}}
-
+<!--
# Disposition
1. Introduktion
@@ -142,13 +142,19 @@ for commons-based peer production.
* Hvordan kan deontologien sætte grænser
for, hvorvidt lukning af åbne ideer skal tolereres?
8. Diskussion af deontologiens evne til at fortælle os hvad vi skal tolerere.
+-->
# Teori og metode
+<!--
{{< include method.md >}}
+-->
# FIXME: centrale afsnit...
+FIXME: @Chopra2008, kap. 2.
+Måske også @Rappaport2017.
+
<!--
# Redegørelse for copyleft