diff options
| author | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2025-11-02 22:31:10 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2025-11-02 22:31:10 +0100 |
| commit | 198985cc3a4d250b3ffd86f5c5550f5ad5017434 (patch) | |
| tree | da5ae4517eb7cc087556b20a55d8ed68be039d17 /report.qmd | |
| parent | 68f5447aab1d47eeaae829a8934dec4ad0971f91 (diff) | |
rewrite draft abstract
Diffstat (limited to 'report.qmd')
| -rw-r--r-- | report.qmd | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
@@ -82,19 +82,19 @@ include-in-header: ::: {lang=da} -Denne tekst undersøger og vurderer, -hvordan filosoffer argumenterer for, -at peer-production kan håndtere problemstillingen -"The tragedy of The Commons". +I denne tekst undersøges det, +hvorvidt "copyleft" -- +en socio-juridisk praksis -- +er normativ for fælled-baseret peer-produktion. ::: ::: {lang=en} -This paper investigates and evaluates -how philosophers reason about -the ability for peer-production to handle the case of -"The tragedy of The Commons". +This paper investigates +whether "copyleft" -- +a socio-legal practice -- +is normative for commons-based peer production. ::: |
