aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-11-02 22:31:10 +0100
committerJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-11-02 22:31:10 +0100
commit198985cc3a4d250b3ffd86f5c5550f5ad5017434 (patch)
treeda5ae4517eb7cc087556b20a55d8ed68be039d17
parent68f5447aab1d47eeaae829a8934dec4ad0971f91 (diff)
rewrite draft abstract
-rw-r--r--report.qmd16
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/report.qmd b/report.qmd
index 9e5dc00..8e3e101 100644
--- a/report.qmd
+++ b/report.qmd
@@ -82,19 +82,19 @@ include-in-header:
::: {lang=da}
-Denne tekst undersøger og vurderer,
-hvordan filosoffer argumenterer for,
-at peer-production kan håndtere problemstillingen
-"The tragedy of The Commons".
+I denne tekst undersøges det,
+hvorvidt "copyleft" --
+en socio-juridisk praksis --
+er normativ for fælled-baseret peer-produktion.
:::
::: {lang=en}
-This paper investigates and evaluates
-how philosophers reason about
-the ability for peer-production to handle the case of
-"The tragedy of The Commons".
+This paper investigates
+whether "copyleft" --
+a socio-legal practice --
+is normative for commons-based peer production.
:::