aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/intro.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-10-06 12:02:40 +0200
committerJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-10-06 12:02:40 +0200
commit8516c85a00c3c56c7ac4b8518979f75f80d65836 (patch)
treef0fec8c8b1a422a00124736656b2120786b2d535 /intro.md
parent99c781e467305cbcb8cc44ea7052e7afce718f8b (diff)
add intro, with research question
Diffstat (limited to 'intro.md')
-rw-r--r--intro.md31
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/intro.md b/intro.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..56705b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/intro.md
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+## Forskingsspørgsmål
+
+**Hvordan kan Keltys observation af rekursiv offentlighed begrundes filosofisk?**
+
+Antropologen Christopher Kelty udviklede begrebet rekursiv offentlighed
+(recursive publics),
+som defineres således:
+"a recursive public is one whose existence
+(which consists solely in address through discourse)
+is only possible through discursive and technical reference
+to the means of creating this public.
+Recursiveness is always contingent
+on a limit which determines the depth of a recursive procedure.
+So, for instance, a Free Software project may depend
+on some other kind of software or operating system,
+which may in turn depend on
+particular open protocols or a particular process,
+which in turn depend on
+certain kinds of hardware that implement them.
+The “depth” of recursion is determined
+by the openness necessary for the project itself"
+[@Kelty2008].
+
+Dette er bygget på en antropologisk empirisk observation.
+Men kan filosofien give os en begrundelse
+for rekursive offentligheders virkelighed?
+@Frega2019 kritiserer Habermas’ teori om kommunikativ rationalitet
+for ikke at rumme andre kvaliteter ved fællesskabet
+end at være rum for samtalen,
+og favorierer i stedet Honneth.
+(Vi fornemmer at Honneth kan bruges som filosofisk teori til vores spørgsmål)