diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | intro.md | 31 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | report.qmd | 8 |
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/intro.md b/intro.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..56705b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/intro.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## Forskingsspørgsmål + +**Hvordan kan Keltys observation af rekursiv offentlighed begrundes filosofisk?** + +Antropologen Christopher Kelty udviklede begrebet rekursiv offentlighed +(recursive publics), +som defineres således: +"a recursive public is one whose existence +(which consists solely in address through discourse) +is only possible through discursive and technical reference +to the means of creating this public. +Recursiveness is always contingent +on a limit which determines the depth of a recursive procedure. +So, for instance, a Free Software project may depend +on some other kind of software or operating system, +which may in turn depend on +particular open protocols or a particular process, +which in turn depend on +certain kinds of hardware that implement them. +The “depth” of recursion is determined +by the openness necessary for the project itself" +[@Kelty2008]. + +Dette er bygget på en antropologisk empirisk observation. +Men kan filosofien give os en begrundelse +for rekursive offentligheders virkelighed? +@Frega2019 kritiserer Habermas’ teori om kommunikativ rationalitet +for ikke at rumme andre kvaliteter ved fællesskabet +end at være rum for samtalen, +og favorierer i stedet Honneth. +(Vi fornemmer at Honneth kan bruges som filosofisk teori til vores spørgsmål) @@ -90,13 +90,13 @@ through the lens of collective belonging. ::: -# Baggrundsmateriale +# Intro -{{< include 20250926-sources.md >}} +{{< include intro.md >}} -# Kritik af Stanford-artiklen "intellectual property" +# Baggrundsmateriale -{{< include 20250926-notes.md >}} +{{< include 20250926-sources.md >}} # Bibliography {.appendix} |