diff options
| author | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2024-06-06 08:11:04 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2024-06-06 08:11:04 +0200 |
| commit | 05ba35d3bbb42a48e11090d37bc2f8b9d652706a (patch) | |
| tree | 9735ff1c55222aa3eba1222c443fc653fbd7a808 /worlding/index.qmd | |
| parent | 59b40f2fa138dec7ab47bf70ad7c99c9b28057c2 (diff) | |
distinguish theory (learning as a worlding practice) from main concept (tentacular learning), and mention in being new
Diffstat (limited to 'worlding/index.qmd')
| -rw-r--r-- | worlding/index.qmd | 5 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/worlding/index.qmd b/worlding/index.qmd index fadf696..33dcda6 100644 --- a/worlding/index.qmd +++ b/worlding/index.qmd @@ -34,7 +34,10 @@ To do this, we propose 5-star reading as a framework for working with scientific literature using digital annotations to frame RDF ontologies. We focus our analysis on Hypothes.is, -using tentacular learning to understand the effect of digital annotation +examined through the concept of tentacular learning +in a newly introduced theory "Learning as a worlding practice" +by Ernst Schraube, +to understand the effect of digital annotation on the learning movements. We base this analysis in our own empirical experiences with the tool by collaboratively annotating the book |