From 05ba35d3bbb42a48e11090d37bc2f8b9d652706a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:11:04 +0200
Subject: distinguish theory (learning as a worlding practice) from main
 concept (tentacular learning), and mention in being new

---
 worlding/index.qmd | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'worlding/index.qmd')

diff --git a/worlding/index.qmd b/worlding/index.qmd
index fadf696..33dcda6 100644
--- a/worlding/index.qmd
+++ b/worlding/index.qmd
@@ -34,7 +34,10 @@ To do this, we propose 5-star reading as a framework for working
 with scientific literature using digital annotations to frame
 RDF ontologies.
 We focus our analysis on Hypothes.is,
-using tentacular learning to understand the effect of digital annotation
+examined through the concept of tentacular learning
+in a newly introduced theory "Learning as a worlding practice"
+by Ernst Schraube,
+to understand the effect of digital annotation
 on the learning movements.
 We base this analysis in our own empirical experiences with the tool
 by collaboratively annotating the book
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

