aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-04-19 12:11:43 +0200
committerJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2025-04-19 12:11:43 +0200
commit3a891bccc7dcbd6239b5384ddcd63c8e39f9156e (patch)
tree86c45b332d6f1a2941409315d218c91c2db6c8aa
parent6dfbadcaab9249f0f4a9f37fdfb83e4def0f0ebd (diff)
update report content
-rw-r--r--report.qmd30
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/report.qmd b/report.qmd
index bd60895..7f9b5a7 100644
--- a/report.qmd
+++ b/report.qmd
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ breaks: false
*TODO: Menna is in charge of this section
(not written in section title itself
-because this section must use the exact name for layout to work)*
+since this section must have specific name for layout to work)*
This project explores the development of a prototype voting system
inspired by the natural behavior of freshwater mussels
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ is illustration and demostration purposes.
*TODO: come back and write about each step,
OUR THREE REQUIRED COMPONENTS,and a conclusion*
-# Introduction - amal
+# Introduction
In Poland, several waterworks use biomonitoring systems
that rely on freshwater mussels to detect water contamination
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ by an existing study and implemenation,
we wish to delineate ourselves from the real-world criterias
that concerns this technology and actual authentic mussel behaviour.
-# Project Planning and theoretical framework - amal og menna
+# Project Planning and theoretical framework
## Use of course curriculum
@@ -208,10 +208,6 @@ under the GNU Public Licence version 3 or newer,
and non-code parts are licensed
under the Creative Commons crediting share-alike 4.0.
-# User Guide (product use) - Tanishka {#sec-user-guide}
-
-*TODO*
-
# Analysis and Design (physical components) - Menna
The physical setup of our prototype consists
@@ -321,23 +317,19 @@ smooth and quiet, no "Boom!"*
*TODO*
-# Testing - tanishka
+# Testing - Tanishka
*TODO*
-# Discussion and reflections- jonas
+# Product Use - Tanishka
+
+*TODO*
-*TODO: discussion about our project
-e.g. what could have been included, what we could not make
-SUGGESTION: reflection/discussion about,
-whether used the guide from role 3 archetype
-(see course curriculum),
-and if it was helpful/right/wrong*
+# Discussion and reflections
-We have chosen not to involve generative artificial intelligence (AI)
-in this project,
+This project does not involve generative artificial intelligence (AI)
due to its scope of data collecting and processing
-from a source of simple imitations of living organisms.
+from a source of simple simulations of living organisms.
Related but different projects might sensibly involve AI,
e.g. training an AI with sensor data from real living mussels,
either unsupervised to aid in discovering behavioural patterns
@@ -366,7 +358,7 @@ given more realistic sensor data,
mainly by rewriting the function `alignVotes()`
(see code listing lines 154-176 in @sec-vote of Appendix).
-# Conclusion - menna
+# Conclusion - Menna
*TODO*