aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/report.qmd
blob: 85a19667ff54f19360a2070f433f833946fe2a35 (plain)

title: Er copyleft etisk forsvarligt? #subtitle: |

Moralfilosofisk undersøgelse af en type af software-licenser

date: 2025-12-18

toc-depth: 2

metadata-files:

  • _actors.yml keywords:
  • Copyleft
  • sharing economy

link-citations: true bibliography: ref.bib csl: apa resource-path:

  • /usr/share/citation-style-language/styles

filters:

  • nobreaks

format: stylish-report-pdf: pdfversion: "2.0" pdfstandard: [A-4f, UA-2] tagging: on template-partials: - before-title.tex include-in-header:

refine hyphenation

- text: |
    \usepackage{lua-check-hyphen}
    \LuaCheckHyphen{compact,whitelist={%
      hyph_ok_any.txt,%
      hyph_ok_american.txt,%
      hyph_ok_danish.txt,%
    }}
    \babelhyphenation[danish]{
      anvend-e-lige % anven-delige
      begynd-ende % begyn-dende
      copy-left % copyl-eft
      der-ud-over % deru-dover
      fang-er-nes % fan-gernes
      for-brug-eren % forbruge-ren
      for-vent-ningen % forventnin-gen
      grundes % grun-des
      hand-ling-er-nes % handlin-gernes
      ide-al-erne % idea-lerne
      kokt-ved-gaard % kok-t-vedgaard
      pro-pri-e-tær % prop-rietær
    }

add alt text to embedded image, to aid non-visual rendering

- text: |
    \renewcommand{\doclicenseImage}[1][]{%
      \setkeys{doclicense}{#1}
      \href{\doclicenseURL}{%
        \includegraphics[
          alt=\doclicenseText%
          width=\doclicense@imagewidth%
        ]{\doclicenseImageFileName}%
      }
    }

define missing danish locale strings, and append link to published source

TODO: override URI suffix (curently falls back to default URI)

- text: |
    \makeatletter
      \@namedef{doclicense@lang@thisDoc}{Dette værk er licenseret under en}
    \makeatother
    \makeatletter
      \@namedef{doclicense@lang@word@license}{-licens.\\
        Kilde er tilgængelig ved
        \href{https://source.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvxyzæøå.dk/copyleft}{https://source.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvxyzæøå.dk/copyleft}}
    \makeatother
    \makeatletter
      \@namedef{doclicense@lang@lic@CC@code}{da}
    \makeatother
    \makeatletter
      \@namedef{doclicense@lang@lic@CC@by-sa@4.0}{Kreditering-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 International}
    \makeatother

#keep-tex: true

Abstract

::: {lang=en}

With the rise of information technology, non-physical creations are being shared more widely than ever before. These works are shared under various different normative guiding principles, but among them, the four freedoms defining free software promise universal guiding principles for sharing with the greatest degree of freedom to use, modify, distribute and improve software. Copyleft is an additional principle that ensures works derived from free software to also uphold the four freedoms.

This project investigates the meta-ethical and normative implications of different formulations of the principle of copyleft. The report begins by first laying out the central theories of normative ethics -- deontology, consequentialism and contractualism. Then, through systematic ethical analysis, the moral defensibility of the copyleft principle is derived based on each of the three normative theories. After extrapolating relevant necessary commitments and principles from the results of the analysis, the method of reflective equilibrium is applied to adjust commitments and principles to arrive at a morally defensible position of copyleft within each of the three normative theories.

The contractualist approach used a particularly strong formulation of the copyleft principle during analysis, but this was adjusted into a more moderate but still strong position that the four freedoms should be made the moral default when sharing software. The deontological analysis proved fruitful, as the reflective equilibrium did not bring change to the principle. The consequentialist approach was initially compatible with the principle of copyleft, except for cases, in a utilitarian measure, where the four freedoms might affect the ability for society to improve it's standard of living more than otherwise.

The project concludes that all of the normative theories can be made compatible with some formulation of the principle of copyleft.

:::

Indledning og problemfelt

{{< include intro.md >}}

{{< include problem.md >}}

Metode

{{< include overview-method.md >}}

Empiri

{{< include overview-copyleft.md >}}

Teori

{{< include overview-theory.md >}}

Konsekventialisme

{{< include overview-consequentialism.md >}}

Deontologi

{{< include overview-deonthology.md >}}

Kontraktteori

{{< include overview-contract.md >}}

Etik og copyleft

{{< include overview-copyleft-ethics.md >}}

Analyse

{{< include analysis-intro.md >}}

Copyleft for konsekventialister

{{< include analysis-consequentialism.md >}}

Copyleft for deontologer

{{< include analysis-deontology.md >}}

Copyleft for kontraktteoretikere

{{< include analysis-contract.md >}}

Diskussion

{{< include discuss.md >}}

Konklusion

{{< include conclusion.md >}}

Referenceliste {.appendix}

\begingroup \RaggedRight ::: {#refs} ::: \endgroup

\appendix