diff options
| author | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2025-10-08 12:00:24 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2025-10-08 12:15:53 +0200 |
| commit | 1cf3b3d2eddd010144c8514993c2c02ae53525c4 (patch) | |
| tree | 64878d597c219c64addcd0e7fd025f8747f5e42a | |
| parent | f4118e03ca5f6168d33b0a8b5fbe662616da3e5f (diff) | |
tighten quotation
| -rw-r--r-- | intro.md | 31 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | sources.md | 2 |
2 files changed, 17 insertions, 16 deletions
@@ -5,21 +5,22 @@ Antropologen Christopher Kelty udviklede begrebet rekursiv offentlighed (recursive publics), som defineres således: -"a recursive public is one whose existence -(which consists solely in address through discourse) -is only possible through discursive and technical reference -to the means of creating this public. -Recursiveness is always contingent -on a limit which determines the depth of a recursive procedure. -So, for instance, a Free Software project may depend -on some other kind of software or operating system, -which may in turn depend on -particular open protocols or a particular process, -which in turn depend on -certain kinds of hardware that implement them. -The “depth” of recursion is determined -by the openness necessary for the project itself" -[@Kelty2008]. + +> "[A] recursive public is one whose existence +> (which consists solely in address through discourse) +> is only possible through discursive and technical reference +> to the means of creating this public. +> Recursiveness is always contingent +> on a limit which determines the depth of a recursive procedure. +> So, for instance, a Free Software project may depend +> on some other kind of software or operating system, +> which may in turn depend on +> particular open protocols or a particular process, +> which in turn depend on +> certain kinds of hardware that implement them. +> The 'depth' of recursion is determined +> by the openness necessary for the project itself." +> [@Kelty2008] Dette er bygget på en antropologisk empirisk observation. Men kan filosofien give os en begrundelse @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -> "Information makes people want freedom." +> "Information makes people want freedom." > [@Kelty2008, s. 118] ## Om begrebet "Copyleft" |
