summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/worlding
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2024-06-06 06:53:37 +0200
committerJonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>2024-06-06 06:53:37 +0200
commit910bcbe63a5e80f569ee5a2e82a070b30f6dad81 (patch)
tree1402dabc7d54ef4c4bd52e42bd84a9614946fed4 /worlding
parentf9a49fc3958f81225d1db7f8134eba67a8c42d7c (diff)
avoid citation in abstract, to make self-contained
Diffstat (limited to 'worlding')
-rw-r--r--worlding/index.qmd4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/worlding/index.qmd b/worlding/index.qmd
index c3b1cbd..fadf696 100644
--- a/worlding/index.qmd
+++ b/worlding/index.qmd
@@ -37,7 +37,9 @@ We focus our analysis on Hypothes.is,
using tentacular learning to understand the effect of digital annotation
on the learning movements.
We base this analysis in our own empirical experiences with the tool
-by collaboratively annotating the book @Schraube2024
+by collaboratively annotating the book
+"Digitalization and Learning as a Worlding Practice: Why Dialogue Matters"
+by Ernst Schraube,
and using the resulting annotations to construct an RDF ontology.
We use this ontology to evaluate the success of the learning process
by interviewing the author of the book and comparing his understanding