diff options
| author | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2024-06-06 06:53:37 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2024-06-06 06:53:37 +0200 |
| commit | 910bcbe63a5e80f569ee5a2e82a070b30f6dad81 (patch) | |
| tree | 1402dabc7d54ef4c4bd52e42bd84a9614946fed4 | |
| parent | f9a49fc3958f81225d1db7f8134eba67a8c42d7c (diff) | |
avoid citation in abstract, to make self-contained
| -rw-r--r-- | worlding/index.qmd | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/worlding/index.qmd b/worlding/index.qmd index c3b1cbd..fadf696 100644 --- a/worlding/index.qmd +++ b/worlding/index.qmd @@ -37,7 +37,9 @@ We focus our analysis on Hypothes.is, using tentacular learning to understand the effect of digital annotation on the learning movements. We base this analysis in our own empirical experiences with the tool -by collaboratively annotating the book @Schraube2024 +by collaboratively annotating the book +"Digitalization and Learning as a Worlding Practice: Why Dialogue Matters" +by Ernst Schraube, and using the resulting annotations to construct an RDF ontology. We use this ontology to evaluate the success of the learning process by interviewing the author of the book and comparing his understanding |