--- title: Peer-production tilgang til The Commons subtitle: Moralfilosofisk undersøgelse af commons-based peer production date: 2025-12-18 toc-depth: 2 format: stylish-report-pdf: pdfversion: "2.0" pdfstandard: [A-4f, UA-2] # generate Well-Tagged PDF using tag tagging # requires documentmetadatasupport 1.0n (2025-03-25) tagging: on # else generate Well-Tagged PDF using latest testphase components # # requires documentmetadatasupport 1.0k (2024-12-21) # pdftestphase: latest # fail on error generating Well-Tagged PDF # pdftestphasestrict: true # debugging of Well-Tagged PDF # pdfdebug: ["para"] metadata-files: - _actors.yml keywords: - Copyleft - sharing economy link-citations: true bibliography: ref.bib csl: apa resource-path: - /usr/share/citation-style-language/styles filters: - nobreaks include-in-header: # add alt text to embedded image, to aid non-visual rendering - text: | \renewcommand{\doclicenseImage}[1][]{% \setkeys{doclicense}{#1} \href{\doclicenseURL}{% \includegraphics[ alt=\doclicenseText% width=\doclicense@imagewidth% ]{\doclicenseImageFileName}% } } # define missing danish locale strings, and append link to published source # TODO: override URI suffix (curently falls back to default URI) - text: | \makeatletter \@namedef{doclicense@lang@thisDoc}{Dette værk er licenseret under en} \makeatother \makeatletter \@namedef{doclicense@lang@word@license}{-licens.\\ Kilde er tilgængelig ved \href{https://source.jones.dk/copyleft}{https://source.jones.dk/copyleft}, og decentralt via ID \href{https://app.radicle.xyz/nodes/seed.radicle.garden/rad:zQUNENBVjmr2gFfZvMiEp9GRP2Dj}{% rad:zQUNENBVjmr2gFfZvMiEp9GRP2Dj}} \makeatother \makeatletter \@namedef{doclicense@lang@lic@CC@code}{da} \makeatother \makeatletter \@namedef{doclicense@lang@lic@CC@by-sa@4.0}{Kreditering-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 International} \makeatother #keep-tex: true --- # Abstract ::: {lang=da} Denne tekst undersøger og vurderer, hvordan filosoffer argumenterer for, at peer-production kan håndtere problemstillingen "The tragedy of The Commons". ::: ::: {lang=en} This paper investigates and evaluates how philosophers reason about the ability for peer-production to handle the case of "The tragedy of The Commons". ::: # Plan a: Etik for fælleder {{< include plan-commons.md >}} # Plan b: Etik og kollektivitet {{< include plan-collectivity.md >}} # Plan c: Videnssocialisme/-kapitalisme {{< include plan-capitalism-socialism.md >}} # Plan d: Personlig dyd og kreativitet under videnssocialisme {{< include plan-knowlege-socialism-virtue.md >}} # Plan e: Politisk organisering og dyd i kollektiv kreativitet {{< include plan-politics-virtue.md >}} # Plan f: ... # Plan g: ... # Plan h: ... # Plan i: ... # Redegørelse af Tragedien om fællederne {{< include notes-Hardin.md >}} {{< include notes-Hofmeyr.md >}} # Redegørelse af Kollektive dyder {{< include notes-Astola.md >}} # Redegørelse af peer-produktion {{< include notes-Peters.md >}} # Bibliography {.appendix} \begingroup \raggedright ::: {#refs} ::: \endgroup \appendix