From cf9325fc917f1208a38ba5a4ee2c85840b78ea88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Valentin Christensen <valentianchristensen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 21:30:16 +0100
Subject: write abstract

---
 report.qmd | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'report.qmd')

diff --git a/report.qmd b/report.qmd
index 1e61116..85a1966 100644
--- a/report.qmd
+++ b/report.qmd
@@ -109,7 +109,42 @@ som vi tildeler direkte.
 
 ::: {lang=en}
 
-FIXME
+With the rise of information technology,
+non-physical creations are being shared more widely than ever before.
+These works are shared under various different normative guiding principles,
+but among them,
+the four freedoms defining free software promise universal guiding principles
+for sharing with the greatest degree of freedom to use, modify,
+distribute and improve software.
+Copyleft is an additional principle that ensures works derived
+from free software to also uphold the four freedoms.
+
+This project investigates the meta-ethical and normative implications
+of different formulations of the principle of copyleft.
+The report begins by first laying out the central theories of normative ethics --
+deontology, consequentialism and contractualism.
+Then, through systematic ethical analysis,
+the moral defensibility of the copyleft principle is derived
+based on each of the three normative theories.
+After extrapolating relevant necessary commitments and principles
+from the results of the analysis,
+the method of reflective equilibrium is applied to adjust
+commitments and principles to arrive at a morally defensible position
+of copyleft within each of the three normative theories.
+
+The contractualist approach used a particularly strong formulation
+of the copyleft principle during analysis,
+but this was adjusted into a more moderate but still strong position
+that the four freedoms should be made the moral default when sharing software.
+The deontological analysis proved fruitful,
+as the reflective equilibrium did not bring change to the principle.
+The consequentialist approach was initially compatible with the principle of copyleft,
+except for cases, in a utilitarian measure,
+where the four freedoms might affect the ability for society
+to improve it's standard of living more than otherwise.
+
+The project concludes that all of the normative theories
+can be made compatible with some formulation of the principle of copyleft.
 
 <!--
 Open Source is a popular praxis for sharing creative resources.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

