From 8516c85a00c3c56c7ac4b8518979f75f80d65836 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 12:02:40 +0200
Subject: add intro, with research question

---
 intro.md   | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 report.qmd |  8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 intro.md

diff --git a/intro.md b/intro.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..56705b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/intro.md
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+## Forskingsspørgsmål
+
+**Hvordan kan Keltys observation af rekursiv offentlighed begrundes filosofisk?**
+
+Antropologen Christopher Kelty udviklede begrebet rekursiv offentlighed
+(recursive publics),
+som defineres således:
+"a recursive public is one whose existence
+(which consists solely in address through discourse)
+is only possible through discursive and technical reference
+to the means of creating this public.
+Recursiveness is always contingent
+on a limit which determines the depth of a recursive procedure.
+So, for instance, a Free Software project may depend
+on some other kind of software or operating system,
+which may in turn depend on
+particular open protocols or a particular process,
+which in turn depend on
+certain kinds of hardware that implement them.
+The “depth” of recursion is determined
+by the openness necessary for the project itself"
+[@Kelty2008].
+
+Dette er bygget på en antropologisk empirisk observation.
+Men kan filosofien give os en begrundelse
+for rekursive offentligheders virkelighed?
+@Frega2019 kritiserer Habermas’ teori om kommunikativ rationalitet
+for ikke at rumme andre kvaliteter ved fællesskabet
+end at være rum for samtalen,
+og favorierer i stedet Honneth.
+(Vi fornemmer at Honneth kan bruges som filosofisk teori til vores spørgsmål)
diff --git a/report.qmd b/report.qmd
index 89d5195..10469d3 100644
--- a/report.qmd
+++ b/report.qmd
@@ -90,13 +90,13 @@ through the lens of collective belonging.
 
 :::
 
-# Baggrundsmateriale
+# Intro
 
-{{< include 20250926-sources.md >}}
+{{< include intro.md >}}
 
-# Kritik af Stanford-artiklen "intellectual property"
+# Baggrundsmateriale
 
-{{< include 20250926-notes.md >}}
+{{< include 20250926-sources.md >}}
 
 # Bibliography {.appendix}
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3